News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Colt is ending production of AR-15s by qball on Thursday September 19, 2019 @07:37PM (#21021822)
>Again: the notion that a weapon is an "assault weapon" due to grips, sights, and flash suppressors is an artifact of a political fight from the 1980s, one the firearms lobby won handily.

You might want to check your facts: the federal assault weapons ban was passed in 1994 (with a 10-year sunset clause) and prohibited guns based on grips, sights, and flash suppressors.

The firearms lobby certainly didn't "win" this one; though you could consider it one of their victories that the ban wasn't renewed (which it has been in perpetuity in certain states).

>given a history of opposition from firearms advocates.

You are aware that it's the opposition to firearms advocates that continue to parrot these definitions, correct? You'd think that if they were wrong (and they are) that they'd've wisened up in 30 years, but since fundamentally this is about what voters themselves think that "assault weapons" are rather than what they actually are, they have not.

Re:Colt is ending production of AR-15s by tptacek on Thursday September 19, 2019 @07:39PM (#21021833)
I think you've misread me. I acknowledge that the FAWB was based on those irrelevant details. My point is, that's because the original proposals were beaten back by the firearms lobby.
Re:Colt is ending production of AR-15s by masonic on Friday September 20, 2019 @05:10AM (#21024661)
So you've written, multiple times, with no citation (e.g. a bill number andvrev).
Re:Colt is ending production of AR-15s by tptacek on Friday September 20, 2019 @01:08PM (#21028951)
See upthread. Did you think I was just making that up?
Re:Colt is ending production of AR-15s by masonic on Saturday September 21, 2019 @02:49AM (#21033912)
You only mentioned the Metz bill, which never went anywhere (not even one committee), so your "gun lobby" claim is odd.