Re:Solar and Wind Power So Cheap They’re Outgrowing Subsidies
by dv_dt on Thursday September 19, 2019 @01:09PM
(#21018247)
Not requiring a company pay, in some form, the cost of their externality costs is an active policy decision. It's perhaps not a frequent point of policy discussion, but it's still a decision - particularly when we know the cost of climate crisis mitigation is so high.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Solar and Wind Power So Cheap They’re Outgrowing Subsidies
by astine on Thursday September 19, 2019 @01:13PM
(#21018278)
"Not requiring a company pay, in some form, the cost of their externality costs is an active policy decision."
No, it's a passive policy decision by definition.
Re:Solar and Wind Power So Cheap They’re Outgrowing Subsidies
by rndgermandude on Thursday September 19, 2019 @01:37PM
(#21018564)
Why? What definition?
The refusal to collect costs those polluters put on everybody is as active an decision as the decision not to collect taxes (tax breaks) that you'd otherwise use to keep the country running for everybody.
It's an active policy decision to have the state stay passive and do nothing.
Re:Solar and Wind Power So Cheap They’re Outgrowing Subsidies
by munk-a on Thursday September 19, 2019 @03:21PM
(#21019663)
Choosing not to make a choice is a choice itself - additionally this portion of policy has been heavily debated societally - it's not like we're talking about something so obscure that actually opening up a discussion on it will require a heavy expenditure of labour to properly research the topic.