News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review by pavelrub on Thursday September 19, 2019 @10:12AM (#21016328)
I'm not really sure what you are talking about. An advertisement of what? Ultra wide lenses? The author is a photographer who writes about being excited to now have the ability to carry an ultra wide lense - something that has exited in the photography world for decades - as part of his phone. He then write a review about the performance of this lense. Nothing about this is even close to being an advertisement.
[dead]
Re:iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review by pavelrub on Thursday September 19, 2019 @10:35AM (#21016575)
What a ridiculous non-argument. What about your advertisement is even remotely similar to the context of the above quote from an iPhone 11 camera review? Pretty much nothing.
Re:iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review by saiya-jin on Thursday September 19, 2019 @10:36AM (#21016576)
To use a word review, I expect at least an attempt to be objective. The article doesn't feel that way at all, even more if you actually shoot at least as a hobby, ie with some APS-C or fullframe.

Discussing whether he is just subjectively biased towards Apple or outright paid is already kind of moot point

Re:iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review by scott_s on Thursday September 19, 2019 @10:58AM (#21016792)
Reviews are never "objective." They are always a single person's experience with a thing.
Re:iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review by baddox on Thursday September 19, 2019 @11:46AM (#21017305)
Why would you want a camera review to be “objective?” What would that even mean? Other than some tech specs (which the article does provide), there’s not a whole lot of relevant “objective” information about a camera.