Switzerland in the age of automatic exchange of banking information

Re:Switzerland in the age of automatic exchange of banking i... by toomanybeersies on Thursday September 19, 2019 @02:16AM (#21013762)

They do more than in other countries. Representatives have autonomy to vote as they see fit, without being beholden to the party line, for instance they can vote with their caucus [1].

This is in stark difference to countries like the UK, where MPs have to vote on the party line unless it's declared a conscience vote by the party leader [2]. Voting across party lines in Westminster system parliaments will get you kicked out of the party.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_caucus

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscience_vote

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Switzerland in the age of automatic exchange of banking i... by Svip on Thursday September 19, 2019 @02:40AM (#21013875)

That's not entirely true. Having the Whip removed was a very unusual move by PM Johnson, which is why it gained so much attention. The US Congress is based on the Westminster system. In effect, MPs are allowed to vote however they feel, but there can be consequences to them voting against the party line.

Which is also the case in the US, the party could run a primary challenger to them in the next election.

It's the same case in most parliamentary systems, it's usually right of MPs guaranteed in a constitution. Tradition and procedures, however, tend to ensure party line votes, but there are no legal ramifications, if an MP rebels against the party line.

[ Parent | on HN ]