News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by Snoddas on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @09:22AM (#21005117)
In Sweden at least "non payment" is not a valid way to cancel a service. You could end up with late fees and debt-collectors after you instead.
Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by marcosdumay on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @11:23AM (#21006364)
Well, I bet that if you are able to show in a small damages court that unsubscription was made unreasonably hard, you'll get them not only to throw away your debt, but also get some nice amount from the company as image damage reparation.

It's a hassle, but this makes companies not willing to go after the debt.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by theelous3 on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @10:12AM (#21005631)
You pay for access, not for use, so there is no way of incurring debt.
Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by icebraining on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @12:25PM (#21006963)
So they just don't suspend your account even if billing fails, then after a year or so they can go after the price for 12 months of access.

Alternatively, they can do the same as the ISPs around here: jack up the sticker price, then give a large discount - conditional on your permanence as a client for X months. If you decide to cancel, you have to pay them back the discount accrued.

Re:Too Many Video Streaming Choices May Drive Users Back To ... by pyronik19 on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:57PM (#21008066)
Even more reasons to pirate. I don't pirate because I think it's right. I pirate because I just don't care.