News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Banks, Arbitrary Password Restrictions and Why They Don't... by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @08:48AM (#21004777)
> this is not true. banks take action and will not give you probably any more than 2 or 3 sets of lockouts before taking action.

Except no lockout happens in this case?

> You must not be from the US. To my knowledge, most banks will refund fraudulent purchases. in addition to being believable at face value, I have also personally had fraud charges reversed.

And what do you do when your bank tells you that they can't see any sign of fraud?

Re:Banks, Arbitrary Password Restrictions and Why They Don't... by RHSeeger on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @10:18AM (#21005678)
Or what do you do when you can't pay your rent/mortgage because the bank hasn't returned your money yet. All that convincing doesn't happen instantly.
Re:Banks, Arbitrary Password Restrictions and Why They Don't... by css on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @08:56AM (#21004858)
Re:Banks, Arbitrary Password Restrictions and Why They Don't... by gruez on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @08:55AM (#21004852)
>Except no lockout happens in this case?

You're assuming that the lockout counter resets on successful login. Maybe there's a daily failed login counter.

Re:Banks, Arbitrary Password Restrictions and Why They Don't... by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @09:03AM (#21004931)
Well, maybe? But for one, that's a big maybe, but also, it does not fundamentally change the fact that an attacker has more than three tries, or whatever the official limit is.
Re:Banks, Arbitrary Password Restrictions and Why They Don't... by nybble41 on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @03:56PM (#21009371)
And being able to lock arbitrary people out of their accounts is also a form of attack.