News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fossil fuel divestment has ‘zero’ climate impact, says Bi... by nickserv on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:15AM (#21002542)
Agreed. At this point I'm more inclined to follow the "seize their assets and jail their leaders" doctrine rather than a "let them continue to profit" one.
Re:Fossil fuel divestment has ‘zero’ climate impact, says Bi... by PeterStuer on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:30AM (#21002597)
I'd suggest, if you go that route, just revoking their drilling licence. I find it highly unlikely as current governments, with few exceptions, seem hell bent on extracting even more, even if that means using grotesqly environmental destructive practices such as fracking.
Re:Fossil fuel divestment has ‘zero’ climate impact, says Bi... by coliveira on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:34AM (#21002616)
Correct, we need to largely regulate these companies out of existence.
Re:Fossil fuel divestment has ‘zero’ climate impact, says Bi... by parasubvert on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @02:02AM (#21002717)
What country would ever vote for such a policy? It is immensely impractical. This level of radicalism is how you get right wing populists who will rather happily jail the environmental radicals.

Most of the world continues to rely on fossil fuel for the essentials of life. Change that before throwing execs in jail.

Re:Fossil fuel divestment has ‘zero’ climate impact, says Bi... by thrower123 on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @02:10AM (#21002750)
This is moronic. Unless we are going to massively step up building of nuclear plants, you cannot eliminate fossil fuel usage, for transport, for heat, and most of all electricity. Renewables don't cut it.

That would just be suicidal.