News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WeWork’s Back Is Against a Wall by munk-a on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @02:52PM (#20998802)
It is sort of amazing that this is still happening - when your brand is heavily reliant on network based social effects then taking a loss to build up that network is hard to swallow but potentially correct. But, if I were to build a steel mill and take this approach it'd be idiotic - some tech companies do benefit from network effects, but others do not. WeWork simply doesn't - if it'd been an office space renter with an emphasis on style and the social environment that had started in SF and spread organically it totally could have made it, but money was wrecklessly pumped into a business that shouldn't ever be in the red (outside of asset acquisition including software components, that's totally reasonable).
Re:WeWork’s Back Is Against a Wall by wayoutthere on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @05:28PM (#21000261)
I completely agree with you. But the problem with markets with strong network effects is that those network effects usually aren’t obvious until you’ve struck gold. The markets with obvious network effects tend to be too heavily competitive to actually ever get there.
Re:WeWork’s Back Is Against a Wall by Glibaudio on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @01:51AM (#21002679)
This is an interesting observation.

Can you share a link/case study?

Kind of makes sense, but curious of how you developed your certainty. thnx