> The assertion is basically that PR is needed to tranquilize or distract people now out for his head
No, I think the suggestion was that he should have had a PR screen in front of him long ago to avoid the current situation.
No, I think the suggestion was that he should have had a PR screen in front of him long ago to avoid the current situation.
I wonder if the terminus "public relations" should be renamed to "press relations", since I doubt milking the click money is representing public opinion anymore, just the most judgmental individuals instead.
PR messages by definition are as always devoid of significant meaning. I cannot really relate to people that crave more of this.