News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by dfxm12 on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @09:23AM (#20994728)
Who jumped straight to the punishment phase? What punishment was doled out? "Removed outright" from what? MIT?

RMS chose to step down himself. That was his decision. Even if you think MIT told him to, that would ultimately be MIT's decision, not the work of some "mob".

Furthermore, stepping down from MIT is not destruction you're playing it up as being. People have done similar (and of course, worse!) things and, after being the subject of some number of embarrassing articles on the web and some larger number of angry tweets, are currently living their lives with new jobs just fine. RMS doesn't need us to feel bad for him. He's still free & healthy.

If you're worried about kangaroo courts and injustice, there's plenty to focus on somewhere where people's lives and livelihoods are actually at stake, like the US-Mexico border or Hong Kong.

Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by tortasaur on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @09:40AM (#20994919)
>Even if you think MIT told him to, that would ultimately be MIT's decision, not the work of some "mob".

The mob pressured MIT and the FSF to remove him from his positions. It's ultimately their decision, sure, in the same way that it's ultimately up to a local business owner whether they purchase a "protection plan" from the nice salesmen with the baseball bats.

>RMS doesn't need us to feel bad for him. He's still free & healthy. If you're worried about kangaroo courts and injustice, there's plenty to focus on somewhere where people's lives and livelihoods are actually at stake...

You could just easily say "Hong Kong doesn't have it that bad, they have food and shelter. Focus on conditions that are actually bad, like starving child soldiers in Africa."

This just seems like deflection. Conditions being worse elsewhere doesn't mean we shouldn't discuss the issues that are more local to us.

Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by dfxm12 on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @09:55AM (#20995089)
It's ultimately their decision, sure, in the same way that it's ultimately up to a local business owner whether they purchase a "protection plan" from the nice salesmen with the baseball bats.

If you think the brass at MIT are in any physical danger from a bunch of angry tweeters, I don't know what to tell you.

This just seems like deflection. Conditions being worse elsewhere doesn't mean we shouldn't discuss the issues that are more local to us.

No, that's a deflection. Someone choosing to step down from their job is not an issue that can, as the parent post puts it, "destroy them at any moment without warning". Being a starving child soldier in Africa is, being locked in a cage in a foreign land is.

Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by steveeq1 on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @12:00PM (#20996760)
I think he's trying to say that coercion is involved.
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by dfxm12 on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @12:23PM (#20997034)
What leverage does an unorganized group of nobodies have over MIT and the FSF?
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by balaksakrionon on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @08:59PM (#21001569)
Signficant leverage in the realm of reputation and public perception which is quite important to large instituations?
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by steveeq1 on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @01:06PM (#20997493)
They all simultaneously call his employer and demand that he gets fired.