Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by fesoliveira on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @09:07AM
(#20994533)
You mean such as:
--------------------------
--------------------------
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @09:58AM
(#20995135)
Yes, precisely this. It's a controversial opinion, certainly that makes a lot of people uncomfortable, but it also seems to be a considered one. Notably absent from posts where people pasting these quotes is any argument against the claims made by RMS. We are apparently meant to assume he is both wrong and malevolent merely for holding an opinion we find uncomfortable.
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by hdfbdtbcdg on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @10:32AM
(#20995560)
To be fair to RMS he has retracted this opinion and provides arguements against it himself....
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by ernst_klim on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @03:10PM
(#20998973)
>I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children
I'll just leave this here
https://www.amazon.com/Trauma-Myth-Sexual-Children-Aftermath...
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by hdfbdtbcdg on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @05:04PM
(#21000071)
I doubt anyone here is defending pedophilia. I certainly am not.
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by dasKrokodil on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @07:23AM
(#21004100)
> [...] necrophilia [...] should be legal as long as no one is coerced.
I wonder how that is supposed to work. How would one acquire consent from a corpse?
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by jessaustin on Friday September 20, 2019 @02:25PM
(#21029774)
Who owns a corpse? If the former inhabitant of the then-living body had designated a particular heir via a will or similar legal instrument, one might acquire consent from that heir?