Re:Where you are born is more predictive of your future than...
by renjimen on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @09:20AM
(#20994696)
> The difference is that people who aren't looking for work are "not participating" but not "unemployed".
If you're a stay-at-home parent then you would fall under the "not participating" category, no? I think that's part of the problem for women in that they are often pressured to raise a family and forego a career.
Re:Where you are born is more predictive of your future than...
by dragonwriter on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @09:29AM
(#20994792)
> If you're a stay-at-home parent then you would fall under the "not participating" category, no?
If you are so by preference, yes. If you are a stay at home parent because you can't, despite actively looking, find work that pays enough to be to be a net gain after daycare, you are unemployed.
Further down that page you'll find:
https://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/NEWSTATS/latest/unemployment.ht...
where the unemployment rates are given: 4.8% for women and 4.9% for men. In a strong economy like we have now, the difference is minor, but in economic down times, the difference is striking. In 2010, the unemployment rates were was 11% for men and 8.4% for women:
https://www.macrotrends.net/2511/unemployment-rate-men-women