News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by ars on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @02:40AM (#20992303)
> Ask any 22-year-old woman if she is the same person emotionally/intellectually as when she was 16. How many would say yes? Not many.

Ask any 35 year old the same question. You'll get the same answer. There is no bright line where people are mature.

You never stop maturing, not at 40, not at 75 either.

You just have to pick a number, but don't pretend there is any scientific basis to it.

Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by csb6 on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @04:02AM (#20992759)
But surely most 35-year olds would say that they changed much less drastically from 25 to 35 than 16 to 25. I mean would you say it’s ok to have sex with 12 year olds since they “never stop maturing” and who’s to pick a number? I think we can pick a number: don’t have sex with people who are barely out of middle school. It doesn’t need to be scientifically verified; it is simply common decency. It is frankly disappointing that in 2019 this is a controversial statement at all.
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by bigbugbag on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @05:10AM (#20993128)
As if 2019 was a model of how we should live, of ethics and morality. It is simple to point that 2019 is actually the opposite of a what we should do and very close to a model of what we should not do, especially if we care for our children and the future of living on the only planet we have.

In a society which on one hand is prudish and on the other oversexualizing everything as a marketing plot including young children, it seems logical and expected to have this kind of issues.

Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns by csb6 on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @03:29PM (#20999134)
> it seems logical and expected to have this kind of issues.

Indeed, which is why we are discussing them. The resolution? Stop sexualizing teenage girls and pretending that they are anything other than children. That is my argument; call it prudish if you want.