Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @01:41AM
(#20991955)
I never mentioned ambiguity, you did. I claimed that the laws were nuanced and not clear cut, and I guess you are just agreeing with that?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by jakelazaroff on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @02:05AM
(#20992098)
FWIW, “bright and clear” means that a law is objective and unambiguous [1], not that it’s simple or easy to apply. These laws may not be clear cut in that there are many conditions to evaluate, but they are clear cut in that you can deduce with certainly whether or not you’re breaking them.
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @03:28PM
(#20999126)
Ok, I can agree we that. You might still need to be (or have knowledge of) a lawyer to determine if you are breaking the law, but at least it can be determined. I was just against the idea that these laws were somehow simple and easy to understand.