"The idea that rainbows are a computer?

The molecules have chemical reactions which function as flux capacitors yes?

Are you confused by how the astral planes vibrate? None of this is controversial."

Maybe that was a cheap rhetorical tactic but just squashing together words next to assertions does not constitute an argument.

This sounds more like something I'd expect to hear from some college freshman who's strung out on too many psychedelics.

I'm not even saying whatever your saying is wrong, I'm saying it's not coherent enough to figure out what you are saying.

X is a computer. What does that even mean? Let's Google the definition of computer:

"an electronic device for storing and processing data"

Surely astrology fits that reasonable definition.