News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Deterministic thinking: a problem in how we think, not ju... by skybrian on Friday September 13, 2019 @11:57AM (#20963256)
It seems like this bias towards discrete choices is built into language. For any adjective, one must decide whether it's appropriately used or not.

Nonetheless, it's possible to acknowledge uncertainty more than we usually do.

Re:Deterministic thinking: a problem in how we think, not ju... by anaphor on Friday September 13, 2019 @01:54PM (#20964550)
Not just language, but things like visual perception of colour as well. We don't perceive things as a continuum, we perceive discrete colours. This phenomena applies to tons of different things. We're literally not wired to perceive things without discretely categorizing them first.

In psycholinguistics it's called categorical perception

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_perception

Re:Deterministic thinking: a problem in how we think, not ju... by rch on Friday September 13, 2019 @12:15PM (#20963430)
I find it interesting that you've used the word 'we' given that a portion of your audience will spend the day working with inference, optimization, probabilistic programming, and the like.
Re:Deterministic thinking: a problem in how we think, not ju... by skybrian on Friday September 13, 2019 @01:15PM (#20964125)
I was thinking more about the confident assertions you often see here in hot political topics. It's good to get in the habit of taking a step back and saying "wait, how much do I really know about this?"

To apply this principle here, I'm not sure I know much about what Hacker News readers do. It's easier to know what they comment about, since this is something I actually see.