2) When I find the truth, you say I am saying its the partial truth.
So basically, what I am getting, is that you are right because you said so.
> you intend to misinform and mislead
You made an accusation and I refuted it. The person misleading others is not me as I like you to recall that you are the one accusing Hong Kong of "starting it".
Please provide some evidence to back your claim instead of just saying you are Chinese (I am assuming not from Hong Kong). That means absolutely nothing in the context of the argument.
> That incident was not even relevant here
It is 100% relevant.
> That incident was not even relevant here, it specifically did not start the name calling from either side.
So where's your proof? Again, you are saying the same thing as your last, which is, I know better because I am Chinese.
> You clearly know next to nothing about the situation.
Ad hominem
> unless you intend to misinform and mislead
Accusation with no proof. Just name calling.
Let's end this argument, because it clearly is going nowhere.
A Google search and one Wikipedia article do not give you the whole story.
Please refrain from jumping to conclusions and spreading partial truth, unless you intend to misinform and mislead.