News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is Rust slightly slower than C? by 4D1 on Thursday September 12, 2019 @04:14PM (#20955938)
This conversation is no longer of any benefit, but for the sake of you and your co-workers... Saying that C is predictably inferior, more expensive, and less maintainable shows a blatant amount of incompetence on how either languages operate. C++ only offers abstractions to (debatably) more easily allow for an object oriented design for codebases. Semantically everything that you can do in C++, you can do in C.

There are plenty of features in C++ that are beneficial, particularly the handful of mechanisms that allow you to move away from #defines, but to compare performance between C and C++ simply shows ignorance.

Re:Why is Rust slightly slower than C? by ncmncm on Saturday September 14, 2019 @03:31AM (#20969445)
You say you cannot write a C++ program faster than your C program, and I believe you. I say I can, and you may believe me.