Re:Google Maps shows sunken car where missing man’s body was...
by herpderperator on Thursday September 12, 2019 @03:29PM
(#20955402)
I wonder how close he lived. That definitely does not look like a street you'd be just passing through.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Maps shows sunken car where missing man’s body was...
by bonestamp2 on Thursday September 12, 2019 @03:53PM
(#20955687)
If he lived on that street or a connecting street then you can see how he might drive right into that pond if he fell asleep (from all those drinks at the club) right before making that turn.
Re:Google Maps shows sunken car where missing man’s body was...
by jrork on Thursday September 12, 2019 @04:07PM
(#20955867)
Good point, but why oh why didn't the police think to check the ponds years ago?
Re:Google Maps shows sunken car where missing man’s body was...
by lallysingh on Thursday September 12, 2019 @04:42PM
(#20956218)
They probably looked a bit, but missing persons cases don't usually get satellite fly-bys.
Re:Google Maps shows sunken car where missing man’s body was...
by bonestamp2 on Friday September 13, 2019 @07:10PM
(#20967603)
I thought about that as well. I guess there are any number of answers and maybe they did check the ponds and couldn't see anything -- it was visible on google maps for 12 years and nobody spotted it so it couldn't have been that easy to see from the shore.
Re:Google Maps shows sunken car where missing man’s body was...
by kazinator on Thursday September 12, 2019 @04:10PM
(#20955901)
Other comments reveal that, in fact, this is inside a gated community. Driving your car into a gated community and then into a pond just doesn't add up as an accident.
Re:Google Maps shows sunken car where missing man’s body was...
by kyle6884 on Thursday September 12, 2019 @05:01PM
(#20956407)
http://charleyproject.org/case/william-earl-moldt says he disappeared while the the gated community was under development
Re:Google Maps shows sunken car where missing man’s body was...
by kazinator on Thursday September 12, 2019 @05:21PM
(#20956591)
Ah, OK; well that paints a bit of a different picture: driving through some construction site which might have been in who knows what sort of disarray at the time, without proper roads and hazards/obstacles and whatnot.