1. People entering the country outside of defined points of entry. We can't issue a work permit to people we don't know are here. Anduril's products are meant to address these gaps in the border, which should lead to all traffic being forced to official points of entry.
2. Illegals who commit crimes get released.[1] Sometimes released domestically, sometimes deported. Some of the deported ones return. Which brings us back to #1.
[1]https://www.foxnews.com/us/kate-steinle-jose-inez-garcia-zar...
2. 'illegal' isn't a noun. These are people we're talking about. This is not a place for you to peddle your propaganda.
To your second. It's a truncation of the term "illegal alien": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_(law)
That's not propaganda, it's a legal term. Casting commonly accepted terms of the relevant lexicon in a political light only reveals your own political bias.
People are worried that a dramatic rise in immigrants willing to work for less (since it’s still better off than their home countries) would undercut their jobs by affecting the supply/demand relationship of the labor market.
I’m not sure unrestricted immigration could work but I think we could increase the numbers of visas we do give out by some number less than unlimited.
While I think it is unfair to deport people who have been here for decades and giving them amnesty (again, like we did in the 1980s) is a reasonable solution especially for those who were kids when they came here, I don’t have any problem with stopping new people from crossing illegally.
If we want to increase immigration we should do it the right way by raising legal quotas and allowing people to come via the visa process.