California passes bill that classifies gig economy workers as employees

Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by tylerl on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @11:20AM (#20941072)

I don't think so; my point was that regardless of your billing rate and even in the extreme, the absence of an employer is always a crippling factor. Telling people they can make their way to the top by working harder is a fantasy. There's no freedom at the top.

Perhaps your state had a $1k/mo option for insurance, mine did not. Even at $5k/mo (if I had it) plans would not cover an emergency. None of the plans available to the self-employed would.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:California passes bill that classifies gig economy worker... by mirimir on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @05:47PM (#20945092)

Sorry that I wasn't clear about that. And I should have noted that my experience dates from the 00s.

I do agree without reservation that linking healthcare to employment is crippling for independent contractors. As I understand it, the setup allows employers to deduct substantial costs from taxable income. So basically governments are subsidizing the obscene profitability of health insurers, the pharmaceutical industry, and some provider sectors.

Back in the late 90s, I was able to get ~affordable health insurance through AFL-CIO SBWA Local 125. But that service went down in flames, so I ended up paying ~$1K per person. As I recall, I could deduct 50% of medical expenses, but it was still the largest expense after mortgage and taxes.

And if it had been $5K per month, I couldn't have managed it.

[ Parent | on HN ]