As I said, my intent was not to belittle, nor is it to "win" any kind of contest. The desire to be part of a winning team has turned the tide from reason and logic to emotion in modern discourse (and especially politics). I don't care if I don't "win" as long as I'm forced, at a minimum, to reevaluate my position and beliefs.
Also, what do you mean by "saintly"?
I'm not disputing your ability to read. I'm pointing out that your conclusions were faulty. Was I wrong to assume that more knowledge might have helped you avoid the error?
> As I said, my intent was not to belittle, nor is it to "win" any kind of contest.
Then you should work on ensuring that your intent is reflected in what you write.
> The desire to be part of a winning team has turned the tide from reason and logic to emotion in modern discourse (and especially politics).
Projection....
Bite me.
You don't know anything about where he comes from or how he got where he is now. Heck - you don't even know that he's not one of the saintly 3%.
You're just looking to claim some high ground so you can start a pissing contest.
> (Disclaimer: I am not from the USA.)
Perhaps you should refrain from comments that depend on knowledge that you don't have.