News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber lays off 435 people by derefr on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @07:30PM (#20935003)
Interesting. IBM adopted Slack just fine, back in 2016. I believe they've got at least 100k employees in their Slack workspace. Not sure if it's Slack or IBM doing the hosting/scaling for it, though.
Re:Uber lays off 435 people by kortilla on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @09:54PM (#20935843)
How many Uber drivers are there? Also, don’t forget that slack has an API so write loads can be very different regardless of user count.
Re:Uber lays off 435 people by TheSpiceIsLife on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @11:02PM (#20936198)
> How many Uber drivers are there?

None, they're all independent contractors.

Re:Uber lays off 435 people by kortilla on Friday September 13, 2019 @02:40AM (#20959763)
That’s still an Uber driver. They’re literally being contracted to be so.
Re:Uber lays off 435 people by arshbot on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @09:58PM (#20935864)
Was this chat app for external contractors as well? Highly doubt it.
Re:Uber lays off 435 people by alexis_fr on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @02:21AM (#20937110)
There is a cultural difference between Uber and IBM which would explain why Slack didn’t shown its limits at IBM: Slack people belong to a startup which typically wouldn’t mind get everything done in a chat; whereas IBM is a 100+ years old company where everyone has to fill a paper form and managers type with two fingers (Source of this specific example: I’ve worked with IBM consultants with one of their products). Chat apps do not play the same role in each.