News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Watch Series 5 by felipemnoa on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @02:25PM (#20931520)
You forgot to mention that in 2019 you are wearing on your wrist what in 1980 would be considered a super computer and occupying several shelves worth of space.

Edit: Some info that I found online. According to this article from 2015 [1 ]the apple watch is equivalent to two iPhone4s (Not sure I believe that but if true incredible). Also this quote:

"Meanwhile, the Cray-2 supercomputer from 1985, which is the fastest machine in the world for its time, is now only equal to an iPhone 4."

Another quote :

"The Apple Watch performs about 7 billion FLOPS"

According to wikipedia [2]:

"The Cray-2 released in 1985 was a 4 processor liquid cooled computer totally immersed in a tank of Fluorinert, which bubbled as it operated.[8] It could perform to 1.9 gigaflops and was the world's second fastest supercomputer after M-13"

So assuming that all of the information is correct then it is indeed true that the Apple watch from today is many times more powerful than a super computer from the 1980s.

[1] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3098315/The-...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_supercomputing

[dead]
Re:Apple Watch Series 5 by matthewmacleod on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @03:02PM (#20932058)
Also decodes and plays audio, takes ECGs, monitors movement and sleeping patterns in real-time, communicates with people on the other side of the planet using a high-bandwidth global communications network, and receives and decodes positioning signals sent from space.
Re:Apple Watch Series 5 by peterwwillis on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @03:32PM (#20932552)
And all of that requires 2 Cray supercomputers, unlike, say, the Apollo flight computer, a 2mhz cpu w/ 2048 words of ram and 36k of rom, in 1966
Re:Apple Watch Series 5 by pb7 on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @04:32PM (#20933359)
And all of that is available to tens of millions of people for a meager price.
Re:Apple Watch Series 5 by peterwwillis on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @10:53PM (#20936151)
I don't really care if it costs $1, it's still ridiculous that people today strap two supercomputers to their wrist so their wife on a business trip in Beijing can tell them over live high-def video to feed the cat.
Re:Apple Watch Series 5 by erklik on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @03:24AM (#20937422)
> it's still ridiculous that people today strap two supercomputers to their wrist so their wife on a business trip in Beijing can tell them over live high-def video to feed the cat.

Or so a person in Hong Kong can say I love you to their grandmother about to pass away in a hospital.

Re:Apple Watch Series 5 by peterwwillis on Wednesday September 11, 2019 @10:14AM (#20940434)
They've also had these weird devices called 'telephones' for a while now, seems you can accomplish a similar feat. (Also, do people really need to say goodbye to their loved ones randomly in the middle of the day on their watch?)
Re:Apple Watch Series 5 by erklik on Thursday September 12, 2019 @02:12AM (#20948525)
Not necessairly. My point was that he/she was using an example that painted the Watch/Modern Phones in a bad light, while you can find examples that paint them in a good light as well.

Also, Telephones do not have nearly the same connection that video calls create. I call my younger sister, who is around 9ish, in a different country twice a day, and she regularly asks me to video her because she wants to give me kisses and wants to see me. That is possible in a normal voice call as well but its not nearly as connecting and personable as video calls are.