Re:50 U.S. states and territories announce broad antitrust i...
by forgottenpass on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @09:27AM
(#20927871)
>should be targeted instead of other companies that are more conservatively aligned.
They shouldn't be targeted to the exclusion of others based on political alignment, but neither should the not-googles be targeted to the exclusion of google based on google's politics.
> Would I be a bad person for saying I'm sad about this because I want to work at Google and I don't like seeing their future threatened?
You're not a bad person for rooting for a company or wanting to work there. I'd just say you're incredibly naive for having a such an attachment to brand. And you're setting yourself to have some of your most productive years chewed up by a company (not even necessarily google) that can take advantage of your dedication with no additional compensation beyond trowing some creature comforts at you.
They shouldn't be targeted to the exclusion of others based on political alignment, but neither should the not-googles be targeted to the exclusion of google based on google's politics.
> Would I be a bad person for saying I'm sad about this because I want to work at Google and I don't like seeing their future threatened?
You're not a bad person for rooting for a company or wanting to work there. I'd just say you're incredibly naive for having a such an attachment to brand. And you're setting yourself to have some of your most productive years chewed up by a company (not even necessarily google) that can take advantage of your dedication with no additional compensation beyond trowing some creature comforts at you.