Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by taneq on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @02:35AM
(#20925619)
When you combine the output available now with the fact that a surprising number of humans on the internet would probably fail a written Turing test, it's definitely useful at least for denial-of-service style mischief.
Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by c0bb on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @06:49AM
(#20926824)
It seems to be supervisable at this point, specifically for shorter responses. I was thinking if you're trying to AstroTurf or some other such form of maliciously using message boards/forums, rather than giving free reign you could present an operator with the prompting text and some arbitrary number of generated replies to choose from. Still entails some leg work but will likely yield more believable responses more frequently.
Sure this is only economical if at all when replying to shorter prompts, but that is likely going to be the majority on most forums and message boards.
Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by jcims on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @07:34AM
(#20927091)
Would be good for phishing too.
Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by cptnapalm on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @01:13PM
(#20930570)
"Professional Sock with 8 years of experience in the advertising industry - AMA."
A personal favorite.
Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by TheCabin on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @07:36AM
(#20927103)
It's weird, after reading comments in this reddit and coming back to HN it feels like comments here are generated too :)
Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by jcims on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @08:10AM
(#20927294)
Wait till you get to twitter :/
Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by worldsayshi on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @06:56AM
(#20926853)
Impressive. It's mostly nonsense but compared to regular r/SubredditSimulator/ it definitely looks a lot more conscious.
Re:GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought it might be
by jcims on Tuesday September 10, 2019 @07:30AM
(#20927068)
The hilarious thing is that the project owner fine-tuned against /r/SubredditSimulator and the extra nonsense shines through.
E.g.: https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/comments/d1zh7r/a_...
Stroll through the replies to get a flavor of the sanity of them then ctrl+f subredditsimulatorgp
It might be getting closer than you think: https://old.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/ (Note can be nsfw, meta sub has best-of highlights)
Still a lot of complete nonsense but this is just a hobby project (not mine)