1. Contacts between US consular staff and HK opposition leaders.
2. Funding by the US 'National Endowment for Democracy' of several Hong Kong groups.
3. My observations of the western media coverage of the events in the province of Xianjiang.
4. My observations of the similarities between the events in Hong Kong and other 'colour revolutions' that have the fingerprints of Washington all over them.
It seems like this is such a low bar that it would mean that nobody else could associate with people in HK without it declared "foreign intervention".
Let alone that you could declare just about anything "foreign intervention".
Those events have also become the poster child for some regimes to use to warn people about opposing them.
Unfortunately, our press doesn't ask the hard questions. No one is held accountable for the death and destruction that these policies have created. So western governments go on and try to apply the magic formula again. I believe that they are doing the same in HK.
Do you think that is the case in HK?