Re:The Riemann Hypothesis
by red75prime on Sunday September 08, 2019 @05:34PM
(#20913582)
If I remember correctly, in my school multiplication was explained in terms of rectangles made of unit squares. Commutativity was literally visible to the naked eye then.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Riemann Hypothesis
by lonelappde on Sunday September 08, 2019 @07:58PM
(#20914141)
It's both intuitively obvious geometrically, and algebraically is conceptually tricky to grasp. Or, more precisely it's trivial to decide that arithmetic operations are commutative or not, but tricky to decide correctly for all operations a child knows.
Re:The Riemann Hypothesis
by quickthrower2 on Sunday September 08, 2019 @07:20PM
(#20914006)
I also think you define integers as successors. Z, S(Z), S(S(Z)) etc. you can prove that a * b = b * a, given that you have defined the + function and * functions.