News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by yati on Friday September 06, 2019 @10:53AM (#20896169)
There are others in this thread who are curious too, e.g.:

> Could someone elaborate on why this is interesting? The linked page doesn't have much context.

Just compare your question's tone with that, for example, and maybe that will explain why you're being downvoted [I did not, but I get why others are -- you deleted your other comment "Thanks for the downvotes..."]

Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by theothermkn on Friday September 06, 2019 @11:29AM (#20896507)
Just googling "42 sum of 3 cubes" would have yielded better answers with less fuss. In general, I always google before asking in a forum. It's like not littering.

https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=42+...

Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by nkrisc on Friday September 06, 2019 @10:44AM (#20896086)
Most mathematic problems, divorced from any other context, seem pointless.

But mathematics is the foundation for so many fields that it's worth coming to explore it.

Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by qntty on Friday September 06, 2019 @10:55AM (#20896194)
Math is done for it's own sake. Read this article if you want to know more about people trying to spell out of justification for this.

https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2019/07/22/the-aesthetic...

Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by normalhuman on Friday September 06, 2019 @11:05AM (#20896273)
> Yeah but now, what?

"now, what?", what?

> What was learned from this?

That 42 is the sum of three cubes.

> Why did we look for a solution in the first place?

They did. I do not believe that you were involved.

> How is it important that a number can be a sum of three cubes?

People like things for their own sake. How is it important to have sex or drink a beer? Same thing. Also math has this uncanny tendency to turn out to be useful where you least expect it. Consider the primes. For a long time people might have asked the same question you are asking here, and yet now they are central in encryption and thus the digital finance market. Could not find a more capitalistic and materialistic use if you tried.

Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by mombul on Friday September 06, 2019 @11:18AM (#20896404)
Why are you so bitter? I asked this genuinely. I doubt PhD+ people do that type of research "just for fun", or do that like someone like me drinks a beer. Someone answered elaborately, and I'm glad they did. Thanks anyway.
Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by normalhuman on Friday September 06, 2019 @12:00PM (#20896819)
> Why are you so bitter?

I don't know, it's just how I am.

> I doubt PhD+ people do that type of research "just for fun"

Well you'd be surprised. All the professional mathematicians I know do math for its own sake. Some amateurs also do it "just for fun", as you say.

> Someone answered elaborately, and I'm glad they did. Thanks anyway.

A bigger person than me, especially considering the tone of your question.

Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by mombul on Friday September 06, 2019 @03:43PM (#20899178)
ok
Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by scrungus on Friday September 06, 2019 @10:46AM (#20896099)
If you can break up a reasonably-sized table (perhaps 120 or so) of numbers into their respective sums of cubes, breaking many types of encryption is arbitrary.
Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by sp332 on Friday September 06, 2019 @10:55AM (#20896192)
Guessing you meant "trivial". Do you have some info about how this helps break encryption?
Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by saalweachter on Friday September 06, 2019 @11:02AM (#20896254)
The math is complicated, but the TL;DR is that you should already be selling your Bitcoins. Dogecoin should last another six months, seven at the outside.
Re:42 is found to be the sum of three cubes by scrungus on Friday September 06, 2019 @11:01AM (#20896247)
i would show you the proof but it's arbitrary because it only works against the "sum of cubes" encryption system, which only i use.