Re:Mug: A New JavaScript compiler for the JVM
by Autre on Monday January 10, 2011 @01:41PM
(#2089291)
Is there a reason you are not targeting ECMA5 (with the exclusions you mentioned)?
Re:Mug: A New JavaScript compiler for the JVM
by timcameronryan on Monday January 10, 2011 @02:03PM
(#2089358)
Much of the runtime has been developing by trying out existing code, then adding support gradually. Of course most of the code I tried out was ECMA3 compliant.
I expect to add in support for ECMAScript 5's Object extensions API (defineProperty, getters/setters) as Mug supports them internally, just as Mug already has a global JSON object. The features which could cause incompatibility with existing code is something I'd have to consider separately, so it depends when a majority of authors start writing ECMA5-compliant code (no function.callee, implicit this object bound to global, etc.)
A REPL would still be possible, however, it would require some work to maintain the current scope between input.