Re:Larry Lessig wants to blow up the Electoral College befor...
by rufus_3 on Thursday September 05, 2019 @01:08PM
(#20888732)
It's a good system for those who believe the country is in better hands when we weigh the votes of those in rural areas and still connected to the land as more important than the votes of those who dwell in the nihilism-inducing urban centers.
Many of these voters live in the Central Valley, which grows much of the crops produced in the United States (over a third of the country's vegetables and two-thirds of the country's fruits and nuts). [1]
If you throw in the over 3 million Republican presidential votes cast in New York, the current system disenfranchises as many Republicans in 2 states as 30% of total votes cast in the 11 Midwest states won by the Republican.
I understand the impulse to push back against the coasts, as someone originally from the Midwest and is trying to move back there, but the electoral college is not a good system. It harms as many people as it helps. Voters in ~10 “swing states” get bombarded with ads and visits, while the rest of the country gets (comparatively) ignored.
Incidentally, I don’t really think the popular vote is a great system either, particularly in historical examples of no candidate winning a majority of the votes. I would much prefer a system like instant runoff where voters rank candidates based on preference. [2] The Wikipedia hole on electoral methods is a fun read for anyone interested. [3]
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidentia... [1] http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/Statistics/ [2] https://www.fairvote.org [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method