News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Legal Gray Zone of Marijuana at Airports. Parent comment

Re:The Legal Gray Zone of Marijuana at Airports by wrs on Wednesday September 04, 2019 @10:36AM (#20877553)
If you meant “not technically through legislation”, that’s not correct. Washington, for example, legalized recreational marijuana through an initiative and legislation [1] that created a licensing and taxation system (implemented by the existing Liquor Control Board). Several states have had medical marijuana legislation for years.

[1] http://mrsc.org/Home/Explore-Topics/Legal/Regulation/Marijua...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Legal Gray Zone of Marijuana at Airports by mises on Wednesday September 04, 2019 @10:38AM (#20877574)
Under the supremacy clause, federal law trumps that of states. States can't nullify federal law, either; there was an issue with that, too. I don't know that I agree with the precedent on this absolutely, and it might be less of a problem to start with if the feds passed very few stupid laws, but that's how it stands today. By your logic, a state can override the civil rights act of 1964.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Legal Gray Zone of Marijuana at Airports by dsfyu404ed on Wednesday September 04, 2019 @11:41AM (#20878233)
> States can't nullify federal law,

In practice they can and do until they get smacked down by a court, which typically takes many years.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Legal Gray Zone of Marijuana at Airports by javagram on Thursday September 05, 2019 @09:20AM (#20886365)
It’s not something subject to a court. The FBI could haul in a user of state-legal marijuana and charge them with crimes in Federal court whenever they want (subject to the federal law prohibiting funds being spent on prosecution of medical marijuana in certain states).

That it isn’t happening regularly is just because the FBI/DEA and other federal agencies aren’t currently focused on it. That could change any time at the whim of an executive order from Trump.

[ Parent | on HN ]