Re:Dive Into 2010: HTML5 Book Reflection
by MarkPilgrim on Sunday January 09, 2011 @10:51PM
(#2087384)
Interesting deductions! I just wanted to pipe in here to confirm that your math and your stated assumptions are correct. My take is the standard 10%. My "top tier" status, as you flatteringly put it, bought me the freedom to simultaneously publish the book online under a Creative Commons Attribution license. I negotiated for licensing, not money. I have no regrets.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dive Into 2010: HTML5 Book Reflection
by petercooper on Monday January 10, 2011 @02:20AM
(#2087801)
Your story provides some interesting confirmations of the points I raised in my own story of 2009: http://beginningruby.org/what-ive-earned-and-learned/
Despite being approached to do the 2nd edition of what was a popular book (in its field), my negotiations on the licensing failed and, as anticipated, the 2nd edition has done extremely poorly compared to the 1st due to new competition and a lack of anyone serious recommending the book because it's not available in an open format to "scope out." (And as someone who recommends books, this is key for me. I can't buy every beginners' book that I don't need merely to judge them for others.)
Your post will serve as interesting ammunition in future discussions between many authors and their publishers, I suspect, and I applaud you for putting it out!