Re:RSA: Theory and Implementation
by tptacek on Tuesday September 03, 2019 @05:02PM
(#20871137)
Cryptographers who are much smarter than me disagree with me when I say this but I think there's some truth to this; RSA has, by design, more footguns than the comparable systems you'd create with a modern curve design, starting with the fact that the "directly encrypt with the RSA block transform" primitive is a misfeature.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:RSA: Theory and Implementation
by Ar-Curunir on Wednesday September 04, 2019 @12:39AM
(#20874037)
Tbh RSA should be deprecated; there's really almost no user for it in standard crypto IMO
Re:RSA: Theory and Implementation
by commandlinefan on Wednesday September 04, 2019 @10:01AM
(#20877277)
It's been all but deprecated in TLS 1.3... however, it's been replaced with ECDH/ECDSA - which the NSA is now recommending against: https://threatpost.com/nsas-divorce-from-ecc-causing-crypto-...
That's mostly bullshit. NSA is just saying "don't start a multi-year project to upgrade from RSA to NIST P-256 because you will not be finished with that upgrade before we'll ask you to upgrade to a recommended PQ crypto scheme".
There is nothing wrong with X25519 and Ed25519, except that they are vulnerable to quantum computers (like anything else currently in use).