> And of course it goes into depth about the Flash Crash without once mentioning Waddell & Reed, a discretionary (non-quant) fund whose errant trade started the crash to begin with.
Waddell & Reed had nothing to do with the big flash crash, nor with the 10 slightly smaller crashes that has happened since -- at least, not any other non-HFT trader had that day. If you want something which isn't some ridiculous CYA, read Nanex's analysis, not the SEC.
Could you go into more detail about what you mean by that? Unless you're being pedantic about something specific, I don't get how you could say that. Flash trading (in several variations) is basically the only thing Direct Edge offers, and they currently carry roughly 12% of the market's daily trading volume.
Don't forget the super pioneering work that Claude Shannon and Ed Thorp were doing way back in the 60's and 70's too!
Also, the article mentions Harold Bradley as "among the first traders to explore the power of algorithms in the late '90s", completely omitting much earlier pioneers such as Peter Muller and David E. Shaw.
And of course it goes into depth about the Flash Crash without once mentioning Waddell & Reed, a discretionary (non-quant) fund whose errant trade started the crash to begin with.
Reading this was like watching the 11-o'clock news discuss a medical discovery.