Flight risk: can we take the carbon out of air travel?

Re:Flight risk: can we take the carbon out of air travel? by pif on Tuesday September 03, 2019 @07:56AM (#20865653)

> I think the most important benefit of co2 tax would be we would be much more conscious about emissions

I think discussions could get more constructive if proponents of CO2 tax did get conscious of the epycal change they are talking about.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flight risk: can we take the carbon out of air travel? by lmilcin on Tuesday September 03, 2019 @10:24AM (#20866728)

Same issue as protecting environment from garbage and toxic substances or replacing our use of oil and gas with renewables. It costs huge, nobody had incentive starting it, but it is worth it.

The tax would have to be slowly introduced over period of many years. It is necessary for economy and various industries to adjust. New industry of scrubbing co2 needs funds and time to develop.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flight risk: can we take the carbon out of air travel? by sokoloff on Tuesday September 03, 2019 @09:13AM (#20866143)

> get conscious of the epycal change

What does epycal mean? (Or what word did you mean?) Google failed me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flight risk: can we take the carbon out of air travel? by szatkus on Tuesday September 03, 2019 @09:30AM (#20866287)

Butchered "ethical"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flight risk: can we take the carbon out of air travel? by pif on Tuesday September 03, 2019 @11:08AM (#20867207)

s/epycal/epic

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flight risk: can we take the carbon out of air travel? by pif on Tuesday September 03, 2019 @11:08AM (#20867206)

s/epycal/epic

[ Parent | on HN ]