News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dumbdown – A Tree Language that compiles to HTML by chriszhq on Monday September 02, 2019 @10:49AM (#20859396)
Maybe we don't need so many "light" markup languages. Writing html directly is as easy as writing any markup language if you have a good html editor. I have been taking notes with html-notepad (https://html-notepad.com/) for a long time and the writing experience is much more enjoyable than writing md, rst or emacs org mode (I only tried these three). Taking notes with html doesn't mean you have to write verbose html tags or the html tags would clutter the edit area. The html-notepad is a WYSIWYG editor which means what you see is a rendered html page when you are editing. There are keyboard shortcuts for oft-used elements like header1~6, lists, code and so on, and you could edit the html source if you like. Although the html-notepad has some flaws and lacks some really useful function (like search and replace), it's definitly a very convenient tool for me.
Re:Dumbdown – A Tree Language that compiles to HTML by pgcj_poster on Monday September 02, 2019 @01:57PM (#20860747)
I think the main reason people like using lightweight markup languages is because they don't have to depend on any special tools. I can comfortably edit markdown in any text editor, whether I'm using VS Code on my laptop, Notepad on a public library PC, Vim on a remote server, a form in my source host's web interface, or whatever it is that people use to edit text on phones. And I don't need to worry about the status of someone's proprietary hobby project.