The “mail is hard” myth

Re:The “mail is hard” myth by al_form2000 on Sunday September 01, 2019 @03:53PM (#20854423)

UCEPROTECT was the pits and its operators were unprincipled lowlifes. Luckily they (like all the pay-to-delist BLs) never got more than minimal traction, so ignoring them and their BS mostly worked ('course you needed a /19 to be effective at doing that)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The “mail is hard” myth by eikenberry on Sunday September 01, 2019 @04:02PM (#20854498)

You use past tense... why? They still exist and seem to be continuing their blacklist/blackmail BS. The ISP in question was AT&T and their subsidiaries (I mostly got hit sending to bellsouth.net), which I wouldn't consider to be that small of an ISP and was enough that I eventually gave up.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The “mail is hard” myth by al_form2000 on Sunday September 01, 2019 @05:23PM (#20855008)

Past (more than 5 years ago as I reckon) is when I locked horns with them. They may have switched policies, I may have gotten smarter than them, who knows.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The “mail is hard” myth by eikenberry on Sunday September 01, 2019 @06:13PM (#20855344)

Maybe your provider was taken off their lists. My last run-in was only 2 years ago, so as of then they hadn't changed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The “mail is hard” myth by al_form2000 on Sunday September 01, 2019 @07:37PM (#20855677)

I was the ISP, & they had BL'd one of my servers for delivering NDRs. They used to blacklist /16 netblocks wholesale for this kind of, "sins", and demand ransom for getting out.

[ Parent | on HN ]