News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Knoppix 8.6 abandons systemd by labawi on Sunday September 01, 2019 @10:19AM (#20852411)
Many simple systems don't do parallel service startup like systemd, if that is what you mean.
Re:Knoppix 8.6 abandons systemd by maweki on Sunday September 01, 2019 @03:28PM (#20854231)
They mean that you can specify dependencies. So start some service Y only after X has been started. I use this extensively in my home automation services. Can't start other services if the MQTT-Server hasn't started and that isn't done until the network is initialized.
Re:Knoppix 8.6 abandons systemd by hnarn on Sunday September 01, 2019 @12:11PM (#20853011)
Sure, but doesn't that also make them slower?
Re:Knoppix 8.6 abandons systemd by edoceo on Sunday September 01, 2019 @12:22PM (#20853078)
Hardly. I'm an OpenRC user. Booting OpenRC vs SystemD, desktop, server, VM. Near zero difference in boot time, neither side was a clear winner, nor always faster.

My favorite part is OpenRC still likes the old ways, has script extensions for new ways, and runs the same path every time.

Re:Knoppix 8.6 abandons systemd by hnarn on Monday September 02, 2019 @04:52PM (#20861679)
That's just anecdotal. If it's a technical fact that SystemD does parallel upstarts where OpenRC for example does not, that just means you don't have a system where parallel upstart makes a difference.