Re:NPM Bans Terminal Ads
by henryfjordan on Friday August 30, 2019 @03:43PM
(#20841911)
> The relationship between advertisers and consumers is inherently adversarial
That is naive thinking. Advertising exists to reduce friction in the market. I'm a lot more likely to buy something if I know it exists. I won't go to the movies unless I've seen a trailer, for instance.
Maybe installing an adblocker doesn't super negatively impact your life but if we completely stop advertising as a practice then spending would slow and all of our lives would be worse off.
You may very well go to a movie theater and have a bad experience because an advertiser took a movie they knew was awful and made an appealing trailer for it. The advertiser is just as willing to persuade you to see a bad movie as a good one. They aren't operating in your interest.
Far from negatively impacting your life at all, blocking ads significantly improves it. Try it out yourself. I think you'll find that through various interactions with the general public, people who aren't paid to lie about products or services, you still find out about movies worth watching.
Can you please list your definition of "advertising" because it seems to be much more narrow than what I know of.
Fair question. I am chiefly concerned with the promotion of corporate goods or services. Authentic 'public service announcements' ("Smokey the Bear implores you to stop setting things on fire", etc) do not bother me, since the interests of the 'advertiser' and the target audience are reasonably aligned in cases of genuine PSAs. I consider personal advertisement ("I have a patreon" or "please hire me") tacky, but not nearly so bad as corporate propaganda on account of the relative power dynamics.
If anybody needs proof of this, install an adblocker and observe as your life does not fall apart despite your now limited exposure to advertising.