News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No Silver Bullet (1986) [pdf] by coldtea on Thursday August 29, 2019 @09:44AM (#20829406)
>The one advance that might finally challenge the 'no silver bullet' rule is machine learning. Not yet, given that it is still an esoteric tool for a specialized class of problems, as part of traditional software systems. But with increasing computing power, I can imagine a future where machine learning can be set to work on broader tasks and start to look like magic self-directed software development.

I'd stick with the silver bullet idea. I don't see machine learning going anywhere, and what passes as machine learning today is just a buzzword.

Re:No Silver Bullet (1986) [pdf] by nickpinkston on Thursday August 29, 2019 @09:43PM (#20835311)
It never works until it does. Many major inventions seemed impossible, but they just took a long time. Software is so young and growing so fast, it's hard to say what can happen.
Re:No Silver Bullet (1986) [pdf] by coldtea on Friday August 30, 2019 @02:58AM (#20836455)
>It never works until it does. Many major inventions seemed impossible, but they just took a long time.

And others remained impossible still, e.g. cold fusion.

Re:No Silver Bullet (1986) [pdf] by nickpinkston on Friday August 30, 2019 @05:13PM (#20842766)
They mostly remain unsolved, not impossible.

Cold fusion not withstanding, most aren't prohibited by physics - in fact humans already are an existence proof that bio-machines can already create software autonomously with no change in physics, so seems like a question of when, not if.

Re:No Silver Bullet (1986) [pdf] by bobm_db on Friday August 30, 2019 @05:36AM (#20837077)
I like this article, but I think actually the software industry has seen a succession of silver bullets. The problem is, once they appear, you take them for granted:

https://riskfirst.org/Silver-Bullets