Re:exFAT in the Linux kernel
by rhn_mk1 on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @04:29PM
(#20823692)
Does this affect anything outside the Linux kernel? Will *BSDs be able to use the specs without patent fears? What about microcontrollers, and the Arduino community?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:exFAT in the Linux kernel
by Conan_Kudo on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @04:55PM
(#20823881)
No. The OIN promise only applies to Linux-based systems.
What defines a "Linux-based system"? Does Android count? Would VMWare's VSphere ESXi hypervisor count? Would a unikernel running on a pared-down Linux rump-kernel (if such a thing were made) count?
OIN works with the Linux kernel community to define a "Linux System Definition" that has tables of packages and functionality covered. New functionality is added every year. It does not include proprietary software or components.
https://www.openinventionnetwork.com/joining-oin/linux-syste...
According to http://en.swpat.org/wiki/GPLv2_and_patents , GPLv2 includes an implicit patent grant
So my guess would be that the definition of "derivative work" would apply.
That's super duper grey area, which is why GPLv3 went out of it's way to have an explicit patent grant.
Re:exFAT in the Linux kernel
by bubblethink on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @05:15PM
(#20824041)
So the code in the linux kernel would have to be signed off/committed by MS in that case, right ? For a grant to have any meaning, the code would need to come from them ?
The definition of "Linux system" is a red herring.
If you haven't signed OIN licensing agreement, you do not receive any relevant patent grants, period.
Re:exFAT in the Linux kernel
by bubblethink on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @05:11PM
(#20824008)
How does that work ? OIN applies to corporations. What if you aren't a member ? Or is the actual code in the linux kernel going to have a patent grant ? But MS may not be the one committing the code. So will they just add a patent grant header irrespective of who commits the code ?