Now we are getting somewhere. That would be one reasonable if boring policy :-) Compared to todays reports from different parts of the world about
- feedlots,
- constant use of antibiotics,
- use of food grade grain for animal feed
- unhealthy overconsumption in small parts of the human population
- while others are starving
it sounds like an improvement.
If you ask what I want though I still think we could do even better than that.
There are a number of other parameters I think we should try to optimize for as well instead of thinking just vegan/not vegan:
- Regional and national or even local production to reduce fragile dependencies and reduce the need for transport.
- Healthier food.
- Happiness.
- Better conditions, both for workers and for the livestock.
- etc
1. Vegan food production wherever possible. 2. Non-vegan food where vegan food is not possible (the Norwegian uplands case).
Is that correct? Or would you like to finesse things any more?