Re:Show HN: I created Postwoman, an online, open-source API ...
by nicoburns on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @06:25AM
(#20818410)
Presumably lower memory usage due to not running in a separate process. On a low-end PC this is a completely valid concern. Chrome is memory hungry. Running one instance might be viable. Running 2, 3 or 6 probably isn't (and you can always choose a less memory-hungry browser).
Re:Show HN: I created Postwoman, an online, open-source API ...
by jmnicolas on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @06:28AM
(#20818420)
If performances are a concern I would build it in QT, not Javascript. Just opening Firefox eats like 400 MB ram on my PC !
Re:Show HN: I created Postwoman, an online, open-source API ...
by wDcBKgt66V8WDs on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @10:34AM
(#20820167)
If you're developing a web application...isn't firefox already open?
Re:Show HN: I created Postwoman, an online, open-source API ...
by tumetab1 on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @06:54AM
(#20818538)
It makes me question, is there any way to run a slim browser for these kind of tools?
It would be cool to have a tool that would: * run a very slim browser tab for each tool * I cloud load/save sites into tools (So I can really run them offline) * Could have a shortcut or a starting page that's just links to my saved tools
Re:Show HN: I created Postwoman, an online, open-source API ...
by dahfizz on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @08:05AM
(#20818925)
Considering this tool uses JavaScript rendering, I'm not sure you could get away with a "slim browser". You're going to need all the bloat that makes CSR work.
Re:Show HN: I created Postwoman, an online, open-source API ...
by morerunes on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @11:13AM
(#20820591)
Saw this on Hacker News a short while back and it was pretty easy to set up. Might be pretty close to what you're looking for. It aims to be a sort of a replacement for what Electron does, without embedding a full browser.
> That's why I created my own API request builder with pure JavaScript (I used Vue.js) + HTML + CSS
So... the only differences are not running this as a separate process and NIH?