News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by Scoundreller on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @09:01AM (#20809065)
More empty home taxes and secondary home taxes.

And make property taxes progressive. The first 100k in value is tax free, then a higher rate on each progressive 100k.

Make it so locals love it when a billionaire buys property in their neighbourhood and doesn’t live in it.

Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by pjc50 on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @10:02AM (#20809645)
Excellent ideas, doubt the billionaires will go for them. Or even the top 10% of voters. The UK's capped property tax is ridiculously regressive.

(Not that London has any parking anyway)

Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by kontorlaore on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @01:11PM (#20812065)
> More empty home taxes and secondary home taxes.

Then "professional renters" will appear, one person renting and living in a 20 room apartment, and the actual rent money will come in a convoluted way from the billionaire.

Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by Scoundreller on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @06:19PM (#20815013)
At least where I am (Ontario Canada), once you lease it, you can move in as many people as you like as long as it’s not a health violation.

Be careful, those professional renters may be more professional than you want!

Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by listenallyall on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @09:04PM (#20815975)
Like this (from just a week or so ago) ? https://nypost.com/cover/covers-for-saturday-august-17-2019/

NYPost might not be top of its game anymore, but it still delivers a great cover once in a while.

Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by ck425 on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @09:48AM (#20809524)
The uk already has a fairly progressive property tax call stamp duty and many councils in the UK have property taxes (or at least our equivalent called council tax) for empty properties. The problem persists not because of billionaire investors but due to:

- Easy capital access in the form of cheap buy to let mortgages. Easy access to leverage mean property out performs pretty much every other investment and much of the middle class can afford it.

- Lack of regulation on tenancies. Very very easy to kick people out and up the rents.

- General shortage. The uk simply doesn't build enough houses. This is made worse by many jobs existing primarily in London / many graduates not realising that there are opportunities outside of London.

Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by pjc50 on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @10:05AM (#20809682)
Stamp duty is not a proper property tax because it's only paid on transfer of the property. I'd quite happily abolish it in favour of a true annual valuation-based tax. Besides, it's quite easy to evade: have the property be owned by a shell company in an opaque jurisdiction. Sell the company.
Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by Scoundreller on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @10:50AM (#20810138)
And it discourages/punishes people from moving to the right home for their changing family size/situation and changing job situation.

Instead people end up commuting longer distances.

Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by NeedMoreTea on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @10:12AM (#20809751)
Stamp duty is only levied at sale, that is hardly the same thing as is usually understood by property taxes. Council tax is absurdly regressive (intentionally so).
Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by pro_zac on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @11:07AM (#20810352)
Council Tax is paid by the tenant. This does not discourage the wealthy from hording investment properties.
Re:Let's build houses for people, not cars by ck425 on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @09:04AM (#20819348)
If you hold property that's not inhabited you pay council tax on it. It's a less than ideal tax but it does tax property hoarding.