News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Provocations of Camille Paglia by pjc50 on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @07:35AM (#20808459)
> It is almost never the case that someone just decided that Jane should make less than Bob because he's a man and she's a woman

That used to be the case until the equal pay laws came in, though. And that change was historically recently - within Paglia's lifetime, for example. It has hardly been eradicated from thought simply because the law changed.

Re:The Provocations of Camille Paglia by macspoofing on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @07:46AM (#20808538)
>That used to be the case until the equal pay laws came in, though.

Right. As a society, we should pat ourselves on the back. It was the right thing to do.

Having said that, nobody actually disputes that there was active, direct, and systemic discrimination against women in the past. Or even that it doesn't exist today in some isolated cases (the recent case in Japan where female applicants were denied medical school admission solely due to their gender is one such example).

That's not the same as saying this is broadly the case today.

>It has hardly been eradicated from thought simply because the law changed.

You're right. It wasn't eradicated because the law changed. It was eradicated because society changed which enabled the law to change.