Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by swebs on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @06:44AM
(#20808112)
Or just don't load any "analytics" scripts at all. Do you really need to know the aggregate mouse positions of every user on your addon page?
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by jddj on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @07:01AM
(#20808213)
Definitely not, but I can see how it might be useful to know aggregates of the Firefox version and locale information for people visiting that particular page.
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by buildzr on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @07:44AM
(#20808521)
Sure, but you can do that with just your web server log.
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by spookthesunset on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @02:57PM
(#20813247)
> Personally, I think they may have underestimated (or failed to fully predict) the anti-google, pro-privacy sentiment in the wings, and it's clear even from this thread and the issues on bugzilla that it's probably cost them enough privacy-capital at this stage to have justified the extra work required to self-host.
Or maybe the "anti-google, pro-privacy sentiment" isn't really all that big. Could be a relatively small but vocal set of people.
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by lonelappde on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @09:10AM
(#20809157)
> self-hosting would be more work for a lesser product".
The same argument applies to the whole of Firefox. It's more work and it's a lesser product. If Firefox can be a better product, than Mozilla Analytics could be too.
At this point it's clear that Mozilla is a business (with well paid management and staff) like Google that is using Privacy as a promo like Google used Don't Be Evil. Mozilla might be better in practice today, but it's not on a principled foundation. It looks like a Google Lite - Firefox vs Chrome, Rust vs Go, etc.
I'm not sure that would still be the case if the decision were being made today, and would quietly hope not, but I guess we can charitably say that the reason now is "inertia".
Personally, I think they may have underestimated (or failed to fully predict) the anti-google, pro-privacy sentiment in the wings, and it's clear even from this thread and the issues on bugzilla that it's probably cost them enough privacy-capital at this stage to have justified the extra work required to self-host.
But hindsight is 20-20. There are sunk costs now which also must play into the decisions.