Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by knocte on Wednesday August 28, 2019 @01:43AM
(#20817119)
I completely agree with all your points.
However, to me Brave is the least-worse browser because at least it has a step inside the territory of blockchain-based browsing. It's the first browser that will add an integrated wallet by default (mainstream will never accept using the weird developer-centric MetaMask extension).
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by ljcn on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @06:15AM
(#20807944)
I hoped at one point Brave would follow more of a patreon-like model - block ads on pages and give the site my money in exchange. Unfortunately they've gone for showing me different ads.
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by _corym on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @09:53AM
(#20809559)
Brave does follow this patreon style model. There's a section in the Brave Rewards panel that mentions "Auto-contribute" which does what your describing.
You can also easily enable and disable Brave Ads while still contributing (though you'd need to fund your browser wallet)
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by bduerst on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @07:26PM
(#20815417)
Doesn't every single website have to opt in for this to receive any payment?
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by bduerst on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @07:25PM
(#20815410)
This is really hard to do because it involves a myriad of ad networks and payment systems. Others have tried to solve it but maybe Brave can? Dunno.
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by hanniabu on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @09:18AM
(#20809228)
That'd be a really nice feature
Re:What happens when you launch Google Chrome for the first ...
by hanniabu on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @09:22AM
(#20809265)
It sounds like you have something against cryptocurrencies as a whole and not their tokenomics as to me it seems the reasons for creating your own token for this case is fairly clear.
1. The developers try to make up a reason to create another coin for something, that doesn't need a coin; 2. The relationship between the browser and the coin is not cryptographically strong and will never be — it's impossible to prevent fraud when their system is just a program that checks for certain condition (an ad viewed) and communicates to its backend, instructing it to give some address a coin. 3. The developers created a billion of tokens out of thin air and now try to give it some value. And traders do believe that it has some value.
I personally don't tolerate shitcoins even the slightest. Thus, I see Brave as nothing, but a browser engine with a content filter and a shitcoin embedded.