News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon Musk Gambled Tesla to Save SolarCity by dehrmann on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @02:09AM (#20806749)
That's an easy dream to sell, but I don't buy that home rooftop solar and batteries will be cheaper for consumers than something at scale. The downside is centralized production needs transmission infrastructure, but that's already built, and between centralized installation and maintenance and a better location, the mass approach seems better.

The only legitimate synergy between Tesla and SolarCity is that they target the same sort of people--a Tesla owner is probably more likely to have rooftop solar than a F-150 owner, or even an Accord owner.

Re:Elon Musk Gambled Tesla to Save SolarCity by de_watcher on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @02:34AM (#20806827)
Yes, centralized production needs transmission infrastructure that's already built.

But any solar power production needs energy storage infrastructure which Tesla is trying to do with batteries.

Re:Elon Musk Gambled Tesla to Save SolarCity by dehrmann on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @02:50AM (#20806900)
I'd bet more on wind, hydro, nuclear, and some natural gas providing the baseline evening power over batteries.