It's not a clear win for either side. Impossible Burger has more carbs and less protein, so it's inferior in that way. But it also has more fiber (beef has none), which is good. Impossible also (surprisingly) has more saturated fat than beef, but it has no cholesterol.
As one of the articles points out, Impossible's main goal isn't making healthy food. It's other stuff like saving the planet. So it is possible that another fake-meat company could prioritize health more.
The formula for beef isn't going to change, but the formula for fake meat will, so fake meat might gain ground when it comes to health.
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/impossible-burger#nutri... https://www.cookinglight.com/news/is-the-impossible-burger-h...
It's not a clear win for either side. Impossible Burger has more carbs and less protein, so it's inferior in that way. But it also has more fiber (beef has none), which is good. Impossible also (surprisingly) has more saturated fat than beef, but it has no cholesterol.
As one of the articles points out, Impossible's main goal isn't making healthy food. It's other stuff like saving the planet. So it is possible that another fake-meat company could prioritize health more.
The formula for beef isn't going to change, but the formula for fake meat will, so fake meat might gain ground when it comes to health.